In the
following message, Deputy Superintendent of School Improvement and Redesign
Susanne Griffin-Ziebart provides more details about the “portfolio schools”
included in the proposed Strategic Plan.
---
Although
there has been some information included in educational literature about
“portfolio schools,” much of what has been written does not reflect the model
that is being proposed for Bibb County through the Strategic Plan. In some
large urban school districts, “portfolio schools” are characterized by:
- Decentralization,
- Charter
school expansion,
- Reconstituting/closing
“failing” schools, and
- Test-based
accountability.
These
are not the cornerstones of the Bibb County model.
In the
Bibb County model, “portfolio schools” are designed, first and foremost, to
provide all students with rigorous instruction that meets or exceeds all
federal and state requirements while providing students, and their parents,
with an opportunity to choose an educational experience that furthers students’
skills in an area of particular interest.
We have
excellent examples of interest-based schools that already exist in Bibb County,
including Alexander II, which has a science and math focus, and Vineville
Academy, which has a fine arts focus. And, although we have not yet fully
developed school options in other areas, we have put courses in place across
the District that recognize the positive impact that interest-based learning
has on student engagement and effort. Our career pathways at the high schools,
Hutchings Career Center, and the International Baccalaureate Program at Central
High School are excellent examples of our efforts to use interest-based
learning to improve student achievement. We are excited about working with
internal and external stakeholders to develop a system that provides
interest-based options to all of our
students.
Moving
toward offering a portfolio of schools reflects a significant change and will
require substantial planning. The Strategic Plan acknowledges the complexity of
the process and outlines a yearlong process for addressing:
- Calendar and scheduling (including addressing school
start and end times, extended day opportunities, and Open Campus);
- Staffing, including administrative, instructional, and
non-instructional staff;
- Student enrollment and/or assignment (i.e., including
assignment to alternative settings);
- Curriculum (i.e., including implementation of Common
Core Georgia Performance Standards, local requirements, and “interest-based”
curricular focus);
- Extended day programs (i.e., aligning focus of afterschool
programming with school focus);
- Professional development;
- Technology (i.e., including infrastructure, equipment,
software and training);
- Transportation;
- Construction, facilities, and maintenance;
- Registration and records;
- Federal and state programs; and
- Communication with internal and external stakeholders
We believe that by involving a broad range of individuals
in the planning process we will be better positioned to implement the portfolio
schools model with success.
Parents and community members have asked many questions
about the process for assigning students to portfolio schools. The specifics of
how students will be assigned will be determined during the planning process
next school year. However, as the process is developed, we will consider
impacts on students (e.g., student priorities, length of bus ride, sibling
requests, etc.) and district impacts (e.g., transportation costs). We will also
adhere to all federal and state guidelines for assigning students to school
sites including, but not limited to:
- No Child Left Behind requirements;
- House Bill 251 (which provides public school choice for
local systems);
- Senate Bill 10 (which provides special needs school
vouchers);
- McKinney-Vento Title 10c; and
- Hardship.
Because the Strategic Plan is a multi-year plan that sets
the direction of the District, utilizing a year to plan such a comprehensive
shift in the educational delivery model allows for additional involvement of
schools and departments, as well as time for communicating with internal and
external stakeholders. Through a strong planning process, we can ensure that
all components of the portfolio model are both detailed and coordinated.
We are thrilled to engage in a process to provide highly
rigorous and highly engaging education to all students in our district.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for sharing your thoughts and perspectives with me. This will be a forum to discuss education issues, so comments will be moderated to ensure they are on topic and promote civil discourse.